Arielle Angel’s Blog
Hub-Bub.com 07-08 Artist in Residence Blog

My contribution to March i.e. Existential Crisis Month

March 15th, 2008 by arielle

I am sorry for my silence, but I am sick of communicating. If there is anything I have learned so far, it is that communication here is different; it is something murkier, more mediated by unseen and unspoken factors.  I cannot do this well– I cannot disguise my intentions as a way of making them known and, as a result, so much of my attempt at communication has been ignored, deflected, misunderstood or rejected. It is hard not to want to withdraw from everything I have invested myself in. It is hard not to feel naive for investing in the first place. It is hard not to wonder what I am doing here. So contrary to my contractual obligation to blog, and against all of my natural inclinations, I think I’ll try to stay silent for awhile. Maybe that will help.

Posted in Blog | 6 Comments »

Reasons to Live

March 7th, 2008 by arielle

I’m depressed. There I said it. I’m depressed because my paintings were ruined, and I’m depressed because I’m not sure I’ll have time to finish what I want to before the final show. I’m depressed about the possibility of moving home after summer travel. I’m depressed about making plans for summer travel (and future life) that don’t include Brian.

Sometimes, when I’m depressed, I do the most depressing thing, in hopes it will make me feel better. When I don’t feel like anyone has the answers, I bring my problems to the omnipotent, the all-knowing, all-seeing– Google. It is a strange sort of conversation. Basically, I input questions in the form of short phrases into the search field and I see what Google responds. One very common conversation starter when I’m feeling like this is “reasons to live.”

It’s responses have changed over the years. One answer I remember from early last year was Brian Eno, telling me why I should be optimistic about the global warming crisis. He told me people are becoming more empowered. This did not make me feel better. At the time, a slave to the New York rat race and a subordinate in a country that continues to do horrible things to people and the environment without my consent, I couldn’t really believe him.

This time, I got some woman’s blog that tracks her reasons to live, but despite some wonderful posts about octopus muppets, Vanna White’s legs and sock monkeys, it was not hard to read between the lines and see why she created this blog of happy thoughts in the first place: she is depressed. She is depressed because she wants a husband and a family– she cannot help but gripe about it in very short lines even though she immediately scolds herself for dragging this negative energy into the blog created for the sole purpose of excluding it. (Oh, Jesus, all roads lead to Lori Gottlieb. Double whammy depressing.)

I was text messaging with Alice and decided I’d ask her what her reasons for living were. She replied, “summer’s coming, Bush’s term is almost over, days off.” I told her that all of these points had depressing counterthoughts– summer is longer and hotter due to global warming, we’ll be dealing with the affects of Bush’s term for the rest of our lives, and days off mean that you’re needing them after so many days on. But this exchange gave me an idea, and I immediately texted practically everyone in my phone and asked them for their top three reasons for living, in hopes of collecting the happy thoughts of all of my loved ones– family, friends, and acquaintances– and making them my own.

I think I may have asked the wrong question. I think what I meant to ask had something to do with simple pleasures– I wanted to know about the little things. What I found out, however, was also valuable if not a little redundant. It seems we all live for the same exact things, all of us. This may not be news to anyone, but I’m posting my findings simply because I’ve done the experiment.

The responses tend to fall into eight categories:

1. Love- romantic, familial and platonic

2. Art- I expected the artists to almost uniformly say that it was art that made life worth living. What I did not expect was for so many other people, non-artists, to say the same thing. In fact, of all 50 plus people who responded, I’d say music was the most common “reason to live” behind love, for the musicians as well as everyone else. People want to live for the next great book or the next great movie or the next great band (unfortunately, no one wants to live for the next great painter, not even the painters themselves…). Either way, it was nice to hear that considering artists, I think, so often feel like they are not doing enough, like they should be activists or something more “useful.” If this isn’t proof that art is “useful,” I don’t know what is.

3. What I would call “evolutionary” or basic needs- food, sex, and reproduction. Funny thing– people who listed sex in their top three (both men and women), did not list love. Don’t know what to make of that.

4. The natural world- people like the ocean and sunshine. period.

5. Self-knowledge and enlightenment- truth, higher consciousness, inner peace (please try to read without cynicism, we’re talking about reasons to live here)

6. Change- It was nice to see some people out there actually embracing this as a reason to live, since it often makes me want to die, but it was listed quite a few times and I believe is related to the next category…

7. Curiosity (so far one of my favorites)- people want to know how things are going to play out. We are interested in the way things fit together. We love the coincidences, the serendipitous things that happen, we love looking back and musing at the way things turned out and looking forward with the same sense of amusement. I would include travel here, and also the anticipation of new experiences in general.

8. Wonder and Awe (my absolute favorite)- This one was harder to recognize in short text messages, but I believe that it was definitively there. It is the mystery of life, the way things come together, the constant and renewed sense of looking at the world as an unbelievable place. My brother used the word “divine” but was careful to divorce it from any religious context. I realize this is what I have been searching for, my reason to live. In a way, it explains all of my obsessions: the apocalypse, the paranormal, and aliens. Though they often torment me, they bring meaning to my life. They exemplify something awesome, beyond our understanding, and beautiful. I don’t mean to bring a negative connotation to it. I have felt the same wonderment when I first arrived in Spartanburg, waking up in the morning with the sunrise, light coming through my windows, and then returning to sleep, calm and happy. It is those intangibles that make life beautiful. I guess this last one is just kind of the love of life itself.

Here are some of my favorite answers (some in full, some in part, with my comments in italics):

Mike Alfano: God, pussy, R. Kelly, not in that order (R. Kelly on my list as well)

Robby: Sex, beer, Beatles

Jordan: the next good band, septuplets, aliens (Aliens also on my list)

Alan Papir: Publix subs

Berel: schlepping, schtupping, and schlugging

Zachary Thomas Coker-Dukowitz: gumballs, avocados, sour cream

Jasmine Tsou: Sex, drugs and money

William Alton: baseball, immediate family, and I really like food (actually, music tied with food)

Jacki: to practice having children in the hopes of not screwing one up

Ryan Tables: my 1982 Casio wristwatch troubleshooters guide

Ryan Reardon: music sex truth (I just like how authoritative it sounds, and how well these words seem to go together.)

Kane: love of self, love of others, music (you could swap music with love of creation, or you could put love as my one and only reason for living)

Erin: love, consciousness, free will

Rosanne: Love, happiness, and the ability to walk down the street and run into Ryan Fishoff and have lunch together on a Thursday afternoon (this last one is an example of the serendipity I maybe unwisely lumped in with curiosity…Ryan Fishoff is a guy that Rosanne and I have gone to camp with since we were young. For reasons I won’t get into, he is kind of a funny figure in our history. It turns out that he and four other people we went to camp with are all working within a few blocks of one another in New York City and constantly running into each other on lunch breaks.)

Rob Vida: 1. to keep society and humanity going 2. to accomplish goals I have set out to do 3. to prove to others that I am better than them

And from my family:

My dad: Arielle, David and Rachel (those are my siblings…typical dad answer)

My cousin Jessica: family and friends, husband and kids, and the Chanel bag that Mary Kate Olsen has that I have been eyeing

My cousin Daniel: Jeri, jeri and jeri (Jeri is my mother. This is a [good-natured] joke targeting her meglomania. His mother, my aunt, also listed “Jeri” in the same tone…)

My brother: He insisted on two lists, one for real and not. This is his joke list: Lost, being part of a craze, D Wade (of the Miami Heat). This was his real list: language (and subsequently, human interaction), music, and wonder/awe.

And finally, not really an answer to my question at all, but a reason for living in and of itself from someone who must really understand me:

Irina: Oh my goodness, you need a hug

Posted in Blog | 9 Comments »

I Am Facebook and So Can You! OR obscenely long post #2

February 29th, 2008 by arielle

If any of you have been reading this blog since the beginning, or if you just generally know me, you know that I have been vehemently anti-Facebook since its conception.

And after years and years of prodding by basically everyone I know (Jordan even signed me up a couple months ago without my permission), I finally buckled. I am now a reluctant member of the online community.

The reasons I joined are simple—they are the reasons everyone joins, and conveniently, it has a lot to do with my last post. It is an easier way to keep people, even when people seem to be scattering. I heard this statement time and time again: “There are a bunch of people who I genuinely like and would never talk to if I didn’t have Facebook.” I used to think that, frankly, those people are probably not worth it and said so, but after a couple months of not hearing from certain favorite people in my own life and then hearing from them that it would be easier for our relationship if I was a member, I began to wonder if I was not missing out on something easy and beneficial.

Rachel encouraged Derya and I to sign up. We sat in her room and did it together. I cannot say this was a calm and enlightening process. I found myself screeching every ten seconds: Do I have to write down all this stuff? Do I have to put up pictures? What do most people do? Did you put the blog address on yours? There was real panic in my voice. After 20 minutes of these questions, over and over, and Rachel explaining that I didn’t have to put anything I didn’t want to, she informed me that I had to either stop being so neurotic or leave. This was going to be harder than I thought.

But in a couple hours I felt a little better. I was at the library (the internet, ironically, shut down inexplicably just as we had officially joined) and I was getting the hang of things. Facebook hacked into my email and showed me all my friends (amazing! they were right there all along!) and then, somehow, I got into a list of people from my graduating class in high-school. I was on a roll—like a fat housewife on Supermarket Sweep, I was just piling the friends into my cart. I was really getting carried away; the existentialist questions of what exactly constitutes a “friend” in this setting and what sorts of requests are appropriate completely melted away and I went with my gut reactions.

I left the library knowing that my day of Facebooking was over and I felt a surprising excitement.

This euphoria lasted less than an hour. Back home and without internet, I could not help but brood. Why the hell did I put that blog address up? I got one long personal post and a bunch of posts about rubbery poops on the first page. Who’s going to see it? What are they going to think? Rachel tagged a bunch of photos of me. I hated that Halloween costume, I really do look scary. And on and on. This was just another thing for my anxiety to take hold of. And I hated that I even cared about these ridiculous things. I am comfortable with the person I am and the person I have become, but something about that medium, that construction of a public face, was really freaking me out.

I began to return to the reasons that I did not want to join Facebook in the first place. Friends were always a little sour when I refused; they thought I was making a judgment on them for joining. On the contrary—I never avoided Facebook because I thought I was too good for it, but rather because I was afraid of the way it would activate my basest human desires.

The last time I was in Miami, Jordan and I were hanging out on the porch, just talking, and we got onto the topic of high school reunions. “Would you go?” he said. “Hell no,” I said. “But would you want to go?” he asked. “Of course, if I could be invisible.”

I think now about a This American Life episode I just listened to about superpowers. The first act is about this question: “Given the choice, which superpower would you choose: flying or invisibility?” The speaker in the piece poses the question to everyone he meets and explores the answers. What he finally comes to is that what is so inherently difficult about these two choices is that it is essentially the battle between what we want to be: the heroic, confident, gregarious person who flies, and who we really are: the horrible, sneaky, creepy person who can become invisible. I remember thinking at the time that invisibility didn’t really sound that appealing to me. I had completely forgotten about this conversation from less than a few months ago.

It is true. The desire for invisibility is a real one, and one with great emotional consequences. Almost every person interviewed who admitted that they would want invisibility mentioned some reprehensible act that they would commit given the opportunity and then almost immediately seemed to recognize a certain level of shame about it.

We like Facebook because by putting a controlled version of ourselves on a network, we can ostensibly sneak around unnoticed in other people’s lives. It is a nice trade off for us, considering we have already seen ourselves. I do not know what kind of “Facebooker” (isn’t it wonderful how this term has infiltrated all parts of speech? a real testament to the flexibility of the English language) I am going to be. I have not been on it but a day and I like to think that I legitimately have better things to do with my life, but who really knows?

But this shameful recognition is not the whole of the problem. Yes, it is embarrassing to be looking into other people’s lives, people that you care absolutely nothing about, but we take for granted that the only consequence of this behavior is some time lost to procrastination.

The other night, I went out to dinner with some of Brian’s friends. I was already considering Facebook, and I was asking people’s opinions about whether or not I should join. I thought Brian’s friends would be a good group to ask considering they are almost 30 and in what seems to be an age slightly older than when the whole thing hit. Surprisingly, they were all on it and seemed to enjoy it—saying the same things about keeping in touch that everyone does. A few minutes later, one of Brian’s friends turned to me and said, “You know, there is one thing…” She explained to me that, like most of us, high school was an intense time for her. She was sorting through how she felt about herself and her relationships to others, and a lot of the time she did not like the way it made her feel. Nowadays, she feels more confident, a more complete person, but when people from high-school began contacting her, asking to be her “friend,” the mere thumbnail of them, the mere reminder of their existence, brought back some of those old insecurities. Even if these feelings had nothing to do with the person, their proximity at the time bound them up in an intangible emotional zeitgeist, and it tended to resurface with them.

This popped into my head tonight as I talked to my brother, who called to talk about my newfound internet lifestyle. I should say here that my brother is (self-consciously) a sucker for spectacle; he loves to be a part of any larger-than-life “phenomena.” So naturally, he thinks Facebook is a ball—hilarious, he says. He tells me that he’s so happy to be alive at this time, that it’s so interesting. He tells me that he anticipates a time when he is going to see the grandchildren of some one-night-stand on Facebook—that’ll be great, he says. I think about all the women I saw today on that high school list, women I went to school with, several of their thumbnails showed them in their wedding dresses. I think of their wedding dresses becoming pictures of their children, becoming pictures of their grandchildren, becoming death announcements. (Where do Facebook pages go when you die?)

I tell him about what Brian’s friend had said to me, and I began to form an argument. The world is already obsessed with high school (and to a lesser extent college). It is only a four-year span, eight with college years, but it seems to hold a disproportionate amount of our imaginations. A too-large percentage of movies, books and TV shows deal with this time period ad-nauseum. I find that amongst the four of us here, we have invoked high school stories in a broad range of subjects, long after the getting-to-know-you phase. Given the opportunity to ruminate on high school or college, many of us will do it. So what are the repercussions of the creation of a tool that allows us to do just that? Suddenly, I tell him, the loads of people with whom I requested friendship are making me feel heavy. Applying his vision, I may have to carry them around forever. I realize that I, too, went through most of my trauma in high school—the presence of so many drugs heightening the intensity and my insecurity. I realize I am just not ready for constant little thumbnail reminders of my former self in the shape of other people.

He tells me that I am overreacting. He tells me he never thinks about this stuff, though he is “friends” with a variety of people from high school that he feels less than totally comfortable with. But as I continue to flesh out my points, I notice him becoming less and less secure in this statement. What if we aren’t even sure the ways that this works on us? What if it is too early to really discern the way these incessant promptings and reminders of things past affect our present? The word “unnatural” surfaces. We are doing away with “survival of the fittest.” It is like defying fate, like reversing the natural order of things, broadening the pyramid when it should be honed, distracting instead of focusing. It makes me think of Jurassic Park: we have created this way to resuscitate and preserve ancient history for our own amusement, but how do we know that at some point, the security forces won’t dissolve? How do we know it won’t get bloody? Who is to say that, without our knowing it, we are becoming like Newman, or that cowardly lawyer on the toilet, and we won’t one day find ourselves devoured by the long-extinct T. Rex?

I talked about it with Rachel a little later on. She is more optimistic about things. Though she admits that she never thought about it that way, she quickly developed a way to reconcile these things. With technology, she tells me, things are becoming so quick that it is literally changing our conception of time, erasing time lapses. The past, present and future are all convening, getting closer together. And so perhaps it is not about getting stuck in the past, but the fact that there is no past anymore—it has joined forces with the present. A good point, but a largely moot one. To use another classic movie reference (this time Ghostbusters), isn’t it our undoing when we start crossing the streams? And if there is only present than all we have is stasis. I want to move forward, dammit!

I invite you to take all this with a grain of salt. I suppose I know that I am overreacting. This is quite a long post for what seems like it could be a totally frivolous activity. All I’m saying is it deserves some thought, that’s all.

Posted in Blog | 6 Comments »

The Time of Reckoning OR an obscenely long and personal post about seemingly disparate depressing things that I hope will all come together and make sense in the end

February 26th, 2008 by arielle

I.

The show is exactly one month away. I spend all day hunched over my studio desk, painting and listening to episodes of This American Life one after the other.

A few days ago, I noticed that many of my glass paintings had been ruined by the mounting process that Brian and I took so long to perfect. We did tests, but the problem manifested itself too long afterwards. The paint is being pulled off the painting, creating air bubbles the size of fingerprints on the small, delicate surfaces. These bubbles reflect light.

It has been hard for me here. Making art without struggle turned out to be just as difficult as making art within it, prompting me to consider whether or not it was just me– my own problem– and whether or not I was an “artist” at all. But I had done something, finished a body of work, and I could point to it and say, “this is what I have done,” and that would be enough. When I saw the flaws, I felt as though even this shred of assurance had been stripped from me. It was the last straw. I sobbed in a manner that was less like crying and more like yelling, so loud I woke up Rachel through the wall. It was the culmination of months of self-doubt and frustration. “I have nothing,” I kept repeating over and over, “I have nothing at all.”

II.

I can feel this experience ending– my body is starting to fall apart as it does after periods of long and intense travel. I have developed sudden TMJ which is making my ears feel stuffed full. I swear my eyesight has gotten worse; I cannot read street signs until I am close enough to have already passed the street. I wake in the morning with my jaw clenched, my fists clenched, my long nails making deep imprints of miniature hillside landscapes on my palms. The incessant sounds of trains, which I had loved immediately when I first moved here– it had to do with romance and reassurance– are beginning to irritate me like a soon-to-be-ex lover. They seem louder, more strident, they seem to always be interrupting. And even when they are trying to be quiet, I hear them squeaking, painstakingly, over the tracks. It sounds like howling, like something dead and tortured– the sound of something being dragged to a horrible place.

If my body, albeit without my mind’s consent, is telling me that it is just about time to go, the next question, of course, is where?

There is no answer to this question that does not cause me some level of pain.

New York is looking less and less attractive to me. Things are changing there. My friends are falling away from each other now in a much more final and pronounced way than the wishy-washy indifference after college. The couples are breaking up. The past couples are getting sick of suffering around one another. The roommates are fed up. Some people have found new friends, new boyfriends, new jobs, new lives. People are sick of New York. It seems that “leaving” is on the tip of everyone’s tongue, but nobody knows to where. Where else is there? And what else is there to do?

Miami would be easy, at least for a time. I could live with my mother, get a part-time job at the gallery I used to work at, make art and sort of get my life together for awhile. But I would be living with my mother. This is a very hard thing to do. And, from a social standpoint, I haven’t been back to Miami in a permanent way for years; though I still feel close to many of my friends down there, I can’t say I feel close to any of their lives. Besides, many of them seem to be getting sadder, crazier, more unintelligible and dependent. It often depresses me.

I could go somewhere else entirely– to the West Coast maybe, or to teach English in South America, but this seems cheap, like running away, like wasting time. And I would quite possibly be lonely.

In all three options, my reservations have something to do with community or loss thereof, and the precarious promise of the company of old friends.

An ex-boyfriend called me at 5 am the other night. It was interesting timing, as I had been thinking about him a lot recently, mostly because I had just listened to a This American Life episode about camp, and that is where I initially met him, in the summer of 1999. I was 14. Last May, after eight years of back and forth, we had a very dramatic falling out and we hadn’t spoken since. It was a normal conversation, friendly, almost too friendly, like no time had passed. And then, as the sun began rising and with the same inevitability, we talked about what had happened between us, the event that inspired the longest stalemate in our history, and one we both believe to be permanent. The tone changed immediately; we were both clearly still a little sore, still resentful about our irreconcilable differences. We agreed that it was really over this time, the friendship as well as the relationship, quite obviously so. This realization should not have been hard– we really did not feel close to one another anymore. Forget love– in many ways, we didn’t even like each other anymore, and we were both comfortable in that. And still, when I hung up the phone, I cried. I never got to sleep that morning.

There was a time in my life when I could say about certain people, “we will always be friends,” and really believe it unquestioningly. I remember once, in high school, having to make a target-like shape in my psychology class that was supposed to be my support system. The people I put on the ring closest to the bulls-eye were the people closest to me. People on the secondary and tertiary rings were my second and third front and so on. I remember thinking that the people in that first ring were definite lifers. I could not conceive of a time when my day-to-day life would go on without them. Though I can still somewhat make out the imprint of the letters, they have one by one been erased from my target– two by religion, one (my camp boyfriend) by accrued anger and resentment, and one by plain indifference.

It may have been naive, but I still held on to these ideas about unconditional lifelong friendship through college. The kicker is I still hold on to these ideas; I have, ironically, just put other people in the center ring. That early morning conversation reminded me of this, reminded me that no matter how hard I try I cannot keep everyone. Turns out that “lifelong” is, in fact, a very long time.

And yet, this does not make things easier. It does not keep me from saving things: notes, pictures, even phone messages and consulting them regularly. It does not keep me from thinking about all of these places I have been, all of these firmly defined communities– high school, camp, college– and holding them in my chest with one dreadful, pulsing feeling: yearning. I mourn every loss thoroughly, like a sudden death, even though most of the time it is more like one after prolonged illness. It is exhausting and eternally painful. I do not understand how it is that while I am squinting to follow the crumbs back to the “us,” most people seem to accept that it’s already been incinerated in the witch’s oven. I recognize that this is the more mature, realistic approach. I recognize that I have a problem.

III.

It occurs to me that the one thing that has always been the least interesting to me (to put it mildly) may be the solution to my problem: marriage, family.

It seems that what keeps me in constant mourning is the idea that people can lose you, that no relationship is really sacred enough. From my own experience, I know that marriage and family is often no exception to this, but there is something to be said for the convening power of institutions. I am outside of an educating institution, I don’t ever plan to be a part of a religious one, so the institution of marriage seems to be my best bet if I want what I say I want– binding continuity– causing me to think twice about my continual condemnation of it.

If I could marry my friends, I would.  But “marriage” is only allowed to be a romantic thing between two people of opposing genders.  So be it– I want something contractual.

Just to insure the prolonging of this insanity, Rachel sent me this article from Atlantic Monthly. The author, a woman in her 40s who had a son through artificial insemination, makes a case for “settling” in marriage at a younger age. By settling, she does not mean “settling down,” but rather, marrying the guy you might not be in love with to insure that you don’t end up alone at 40.

She makes a very, very convincing argument and reading it gives you a sinking feeling and a headache. Her point: marriage is bad, but loneliness is worse. Marriage is not about passion after a couple of years anyway, so if you make no grand expectations and pick the guy who is safe, your life will be boring, but pleasantly functional, and that beats alone, exhausted, unwanted and miserable.

I have no trouble agreeing with her. I have long ago thrown away the so-called radical feminist implications of wanting to be in a stable, familial relationship with a man. Watch enough Sex and the City episodes in a row and you realize the alternative is just too bleak. The sexual revolution was created by men, for men. Women, with few exceptions, can dabble in it, but find much more fulfillment and empowerment (as terrible as it sounds) being loved and respected within these albeit conventional modes. I just didn’t think it would ever start to sound good to me. Now, I begin to uncover that I have been the perfect candidate for this system all along. I value time invested above all else. I am unfailingly loyal. And most importantly for these purposes, I am infinitely more sentimental than I am romantic.

IV.

We are almost at the end of this experience. I find myself on the brink of leaving yet another group of people who have become important to me, perhaps never to really cross paths in such an intensive way ever again. I find myself on the brink of a decision: whether to return to the relationships of two former lives or to create a new one entirely. The last option seems the most threatening. I say it’s because I am afraid it is a “waste of time.” It’s not exactly that. Perhaps it is simply that I am wary of picking up yet another set of new people who will keep little tiny pieces of my heart with them, only to grind them up and scatter the dust at a later date. Perhaps I am afraid that soon there will be nothing left to leave behind.

Or perhaps it is that I know there is no long term home for me on the West Coast or in South America, and all I want right now is to “settle.” Perhaps in the face of yet another transition, in the striking absence of attachments, feeling for the first time almost ever that I am a person alone and that no one is bound to me and I am bound to no one, I am again searching in a panicked desperation for “home.” It is the theme of this experience; I know that now. I think again about a confession, uttered to me in shameful secrecy when I left New York about the yearning to pick a person and make a home out of them, to follow them wherever they go, so you can never be homeless. It sounds like the best idea I have ever heard. Having been homeless for so long, I cannot suppress the instinctual urge to “settle.” It sort of feels like drowning.

I used to think that I was a person who knew myself impossibly well. I am not a superficial person, but somehow all of myself, in all its complexity, floated to the surface long ago. I have taken pride in the fact that I can wear it all at once and with transparency. If there was nothing else, it was that I knew myself– it was a quality that most people could not purport to have.

And now– like I found myself reciting over my dead paintings the other night– “I have nothing, I have nothing at all.”

I am leaving Spartanburg with more doubts about the nature of my identity than I have ever had before. While I, of course, have no plans to seek marriage, my consideration of it is proof enough that something inside me has turned, melted one of those pillars of opinion that never seem to erode within me. I don’t know if I am an artist. I don’t know that I belong in New York, or anywhere else for that matter.

I have nothing.

And strangely, this nothingness, this scraped bare nothingness, is quite possibly the most incredible gift that Spartanburg has been able to give. It is an opportunity for reconsideration. And I may very well carry it into my future, let it inform the future’s most difficult task: namely, creating a home that really feels like home, a home that is indubitably my own.

Posted in Blog | 1 Comment »

Post-cleanse update OR Time to get dirty all over again

February 18th, 2008 by arielle

We are done! We are eating! We are chewing our food!

I have to admit I was pretty bummed when I heard that dairy was out for a while. Anyone who knows me knows that besides “I’m going to kill myself” (sometimes in the plural, as in, “let’s kill ourselves”) “I’ve never met a cheese I didn’t like” is one of my most commonly uttered statements.

On Day 9, I was feeling particularly close to both of those statements, i.e. Brian was making grilled cheese in my kitchen and if I didn’t get a bite of it in the next ten minutes, I would kill myself. Since the first day of the cleanse, I was having nightmares that I was eating things by accident, thereby ruining the cleanse, and later on, endangering my system. The dreams were not helping any.

So Rachel and I did the next best thing to suicide and we went entirely insane. We both were in our studios at our computers, emailing recipes back and forth rapid fire. I ran in with my vegetarian cookbook and flagged all the vegan/ non-bready recipes I could find. We scoured the web. We drooled over foods that were still forbidden, but would not be soon. It was fast-paced, it was excessive, it was literally insane.

Two to three hours later, we had our entire menu for the next week or so plotted out, a soup and a salad for each day and even (gasp!) brunch on Sunday morning (vegetable hash, smoothie with coconut milk and fruit).

We went food shopping on Day 10, almost all produce (unfortunately, no fava beans or jicama anywhere in Spartanburg). And we’ve been cookin’! I have to say that since we’ve begun this experiment in healthier diets, I have not been craving dairy. Well, that’s not entirely true. I dreamt last night of a bagel and cream cheese. I still miss those. But the idea of eating one makes me kind of sick.

Here is the recipe for a salad we made Saturday night that ruled (especially compared to time expended and preparation difficulty, of which there is little):

New Spring Vegetable Salad

(serves 4)

1 1/2 lbs small new potatoes, halved

14-ounce can fava beans, drained

4 ounces cherry tomatoes

1/2 cup walnut halves

2 tablespoons white wine vinegar

1 tablespoon whole-grain mustard

1/4 cup olive oil

pinch of sugar

8 ounces young asparagus spears, trimmed

6 scallions, trimmed

salt and freshly ground black pepper

baby spinach leaves, to serve

1. Put the potatoes in a saucepan. Cover with cold water and bring to boil. Cook for 10-12 minutes, until tender. Meanwhile, put the fava beans in a bowl. Cut the tomatoes in half and add them to the bowl with the walnuts.

2. Put the white wine vinegar, mustard, olive oil and sugar in a screw-top jar. Season with salt and pepper. Close the jar tightly and shake well.

3. Add the asparagus to the potatoes and cook for 3 minutes more. Drain the cooked vegetables well. Cool under cold running water and drain again. Thickly slice the potatoes and cut the scallions in half.

4. Add the asparagus, potatoes and scallions to the bowl containing the fava bean mixture. Pour the dressing over the salad and toss well. Serve on a bed of baby spinach leaves.

NOTE: We doubled the dressing recipe and that was awesome. We also felt the amount of walnuts could be bumped up a little with positive effects.

Enjoy!

Posted in Blog | 2 Comments »

Al Gore and Aliens OR These are a few of my favorite things

February 12th, 2008 by arielle

From Harper’s weekly:

“Democratic primaries left neither Senator Barack Obama nor Senator Hillary Clinton with a clear lead over the other, and operatives inside the Clinton campaign speculated that if the Democratic presidential nominee were not chosen until the convention, Al Gore could emerge as a compromise candidate. ‘There’s a 5 percent chance of that happening,’ a Clinton source said, ‘but that’s 5 percent too high.’”

“NASA celebrated its 50th anniversary by beaming the Beatles hit ‘Across the Universe’ into deep space, directing the song toward Polaris, 431 light-years away. Scientists meeting at Arizona State University were concerned that the broadcast could provoke an attack by mean-spirited aliens. ‘Before sending out even symbolic messages,’ said a researcher, ‘we need an open discussion about the potential risks.’”

What a world.

(Thanks Alice.)

Posted in Blog | No Comments »

Day 8 of the cleanse OR i want a $%*&ing cheeseburger and i don’t even eat meat

February 11th, 2008 by arielle

So, I know I promised full coverage, but trust me, you’d rather not know. There has been all kinds of weird-looking, foul-smelling, crazy-textured things coming out of my body these days. My tongue has a fuzzy cheese-like coating on it that is sometimes slightly green and sometimes slightly orange. My breath smells like a strange variation of ashtray, even though I brush my teeth sometimes three times a day, and I’m not even going to go into what’s coming out of my butt (ok, if you must know, its blackish and rubbery.)

I’ve heard from friends who have done the cleanse that towards the end of it your body begins to crave the drink instead food, and that you feel so good that even once you’re done with it you don’t want to eat things that are bad for you. Well, I don’t know if I’m an alien, but I hate this damn drink. I want it less and less each day. Instead, I suddenly want all of the most horrible things I can think of. I want to stuff it all down my throat and then lick the grease from the plates. I can’t drive by a Waffle House (which I normally hate) without salivating over soggy, yellowed hash browns and limp toast dripping with “apple” butter (like there’s really something fruit based in there, ha!). I was driving along yesterday, looking at all of the restaurant signs and I actually considered for a second pulling over and entering a Japanese steakhouse. I HAVEN’T EATEN MEAT IN 15 YEARS! But now that I’m on the cleanse, steak suddenly sounds acceptable to me.

In the beginning of the cleanse, I was feeling really energetic. I was waking up feeling well-rested after an ample 7 or 8 hours, which has been a struggle for me since I have been here. But now, all that has faded and I just feel tired. Less physically than emotionally. As Rachel put it, “the cleanse is boring.” Without different flavors there is nothing to look forward to in life, nothing wonderful to break up your day. In its place, there is only cayenne pepper.

Either way, I’m glad I am doing it, and I’m glad that it’s almost over. I do feel healthier. I do recognize that all that butt rubber would sit in my system forever and make me feel yuck.

I just miss food.

In honor of food, I will share with you the list of things that I miss eating in Spartanburg:

  • Rosemary Olive Oil bagels with extra onion and chive cream cheese from Bruegger’s
  • the Allie sandwich or the Loaded Veggie sandwich (the only difference being that one is grilled and one is cold) from The Coffee Cup, with bananas/granola and pasta salad on the side
  • Pad Kee Mow from Lime Leaf
  • Chat Samosa from Five Spice (this might be the one I miss the most, I think there is crack in that thing)
  • Thai Lettuce Wraps with tofu and Pad Thai from Monsoon
  • Papa’s Crisp Golden Waffle with a side of hash browns from Papa Sam’s
  • Black Raspberry ice cream/sorbet/yogurt (depending on availability) from Bruster’s
  • Veggie Cheeseburger with the works and fried green beans/cajun fries from the Nu-Way
  • Guacamole Azteca from Bronco
  • Nut n Honey wraps from Roly Poly (minus the Fox News, of course)
  • Salad bar from Jason’s Deli, and the unbelievably wonderful panoply and vegetables, side salads and mini-muffin cornbreads
  • and most importantly, grilled cheese, mac n cheese, beautiful salads, muriel heslop, and Turkish delight from Derya’s room…

Ah, those were the days…

Posted in Blog | 2 Comments »

The End of the World

February 6th, 2008 by arielle

06storm4600.jpg

“Forecasters said the unusual winter tornadoes were caused by unusually warm temperatures in the region. But cold weather, possibly with snow and sleet, was expected to follow the line of thunderstorms.”

50 people dead across Tennessee, Arkansas, Alabama and Kentucky in something like 67 simultaneous tornadoes.

I am not so much a God person, but I think it is some sort of divine message that this has happened on Super Tuesday. Whichever one of you assholes gets elected (and believe me, you’re all assholes, even you Obama– I don’t trust a-one of you), you have to deal with this. No more fucking around.

It’s time to take a good look at our presidential candidates’ environmental record. None of them are doing enough. Even Obama (the candidate of “change”) is all entangled in the coal interest (which is about the oldest and dirtiest form of energy we have).

“‘According to the League of Conservation Voters, in 140 debates and interviews since early 2007, five top TV interviewers (Tim Russert, Chris Wallace, George Stephanopoulos, Bob Schieffer and Wolf Blitzer) have asked 2,484 questions of presidential candidates, and they have mentioned global warming only three times and asked only 24 questions related to the issue,’ notes Stinebrickner, who holds a University Professorship at DePauw. What’s equally worrisome: the candidates themselves aren’t bringing up environmental issues, he states.” (full article here.)

It’s time we start demanding that these questions be asked and answered…and if anybody knows how that’s done, um, I guess, do it and, um, let me know.

Oh, brother.

Posted in Blog | No Comments »

we aspire to be the masters of the cleanse OR the box part deux

February 4th, 2008 by arielle

So Rachel and I are doing the Master Cleanse aka The Lemonade Diet.  Basically, we are not eating for 10 days, but only drinking water and this special lemonade concoction made from fresh squeezed lemon or lime juice, grade b maple syrup and cayenne pepper. That’s all we’re drinking for 10 days.   At night, we have to drink “Smooth Moves” tea and in the morning we have to drink a quart of warm salt water.  This makes us poop.  Pooping is very important to the master cleanse.  Apparently, we will be doing a lot of it.

I plan to give updates via the blog because I hear we can expect all kinds of wonderful things to begin happening to our bodies in the next week and a half.  You will be privy to all the gory details, whether you like it or not (ok, maybe not ALL of them– I don’t want to make you vom, but I think we need to agree to a certain level of openness and comfortability with all of our natural, and in this case induced, body functions…and when I say “our,” I mean mine– get your own blog.)

I’m beginning to think about this as kin to the box experience.  Basically, Rachel and I, together again, ingesting the same things, feeling the same things in a somewhat isolating experience.  In the same way, it seems like a social experiment.  Beyond the basic need for sustenance, what happens when the social element of food is removed from your life?  I was telling Brian that I’m pretty unsure what we’re going to do with each other now that I’m not going out to eat.  And I’m sure, in the same way as the box did, it is going to push Nicholas and Derya back together, if only at dinnertime.

I’ll keep you posted. Now, I’ve gotta go drink some of this stuff…

Posted in Blog | 3 Comments »

Someone in Spartanburg thought this was a good name for a restaurant…

February 4th, 2008 by arielle

poons.jpg

Babylicious is just down the street…next to Salon Surreal and Hair It Is.

Posted in Blog | 2 Comments »

« Previous Entries Next Entries »